CVE-2025-59410 json
Dragonfly tiny file download uses hard coded HTTP protocol
published last yr. modified 4mo ago also GHSA-mcvp-rpgg-9273 , GO-2025-3974 , EUVD-2025-29765
- cvss
- 3.7
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.1%
- EPSS 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 3%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. Prior to 2.1.0, the code in the scheduler for downloading a tiny file is hard coded to use the HTTP protocol, rather than HTTPS. This means that an attacker could perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack, changing the network request so that a different piece of data gets downloaded. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0.
Patch / fix
- go github.com/dragonflyoss/dragonfly 2.1.0
- go d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 2.1.0
- linuxfoundation dragonfly 2.1.0
- govulncheck-vulndb SLE Module for Package Hub 15 SP6, openSUSE Leap 15.6 0.0.20251023T162509-150000.1.110.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2025:3799-1
- govulncheck-vulndb openSUSE Leap 16.0 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1
- govulncheck-vulndb openSUSE Tumbleweed 0.0.20250924T192141-1.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1openSUSE-SU-2025:15576-1
Is CVE-2025-59410 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- last yr.
Exploit prediction
0.14% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 3% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 5.5 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P |
| CNA | 4.0 | 5.5 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
| NVD | 3.1 | 3.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 3.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/dragonflyoss/dragonfly | <2.1.0 all versions |
2.1.0 |
| go | d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 | <2.1.0 |
2.1.0 |
Affected products
- dragonflyoss dragonfly
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
References
-
github.com
/dragonflyoss/dragonfly/security/advisories/GHSA-mcvp-rpgg-9273
web, patch, third-party-advisory, advisory
-
github.com
/dragonflyoss/dragonfly/blob/main/docs/security/dragonfly-comprehensive-report-2023.pdf
web, product
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59410
advisory
-
github.com
/dragonflyoss/dragonfly
package
-
pkg.go.dev
/vuln/GO-2025-3974
web
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-59410
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-mcvp-rpgg-9273
- NVD CVE-2025-59410
- OSV GO-2025-3974
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.