Skip to content
Fencer Intel
low 2.7

CVE-2025-9821 json

SSRF via webhook function

published last yr. modified 21d ago also GHSA-hj6f-7hp7-xg69 , EUVD-2025-26495

cvss
2.7
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.3%
EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 23%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed

DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF.

ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services. See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/  for more potential impact.

Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html  for more information on SSRF and its fix.

Patch / fix

  • packagist mautic/core 4.4.17, 5.2.8, 6.0.5

Is CVE-2025-9821 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
last yr.

Exploit prediction

0.30% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 23% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 2.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
GitHub 3.1 2.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
packagist mautic/core
>=4.4.0, <4.4.17
>=5.0.0-alpha, <5.2.8
>=6.0.0-alpha, <6.0.5
4.4.17
5.2.8
6.0.5

Affected products

  • Mautic Mautic

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.