Skip to content
Fencer Intel
critical 9.3

CVE-2026-100144 json

IVPAY payments <= 1.0.8 - Unauthenticated SQLi via 'payment_id' Parameter

published 4d ago modified 3d ago also EUVD-2026-117349

cvss
9.3
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.3%
EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 17%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

The IVPAY payments WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not sanitise a value from its payment callback before using it in a SQL statement, and treats an empty API key, which is its own default, as valid authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary data from the database.

Is CVE-2026-100144 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
3d ago

Exploit prediction

0.26% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 17% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • wpscan.com https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d90db791-2223-480b-8d2f-b84170318fc4/ referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CISA ADP 3.1 9.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CNA 3.1 9.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Affected products

  • Unknown IVPAY payments

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command
Technology feeds

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.