Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.3

CVE-2026-103327 json

CryptoCloud - Crypto Payment Gateway 3.0.0 - 3.0.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Order Payment Forgery via Empty-Default Webhook Secret

published 6d ago modified 5d ago also EUVD-2026-115720

cvss
5.3
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.1%
EPSS 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 1%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

The CryptoCloud WordPress plugin from 3.0.0 through 3.0.1 does not verify the authenticity of the payment notifications received by its gateway callback, as the integrity check is skipped while the webhook secret is left at its empty default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary orders as paid or failed without any payment being made.

Is CVE-2026-103327 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
5d ago

Exploit prediction

0.11% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 1% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • wpscan.com https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/fd5563ed-85c6-4b17-acf6-bdc2cd77dd4b/ referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Affected products

  • Unknown CryptoCloud

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Technology feeds

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.