Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.4

CVE-2026-105698 json

Langflow: Cross-user flow access and vertex execution via deprecated /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpoints

published last mo. modified 25d ago also EUVD-2026-92790 , GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw , PYSEC-2026-4234 , PYSEC-2026-4238

cvss
5.4
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 13%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. From 1.0.0 until 1.10.1, Langflow did not verify flow ownership in the deprecated POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices and POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices/{vertex_id} handlers. Through version 1.7.1, an unauthenticated caller who knew another user's flow UUID could reach these handlers; from version 1.7.2 through 1.10.0, callers had to authenticate but needed no elevated privileges. Such a caller could cause retrieve_vertices_order to load and cache the private graph, enumerate its vertex identifiers, and use build_vertex to execute selected vertices and receive their results. build_graph_from_db_no_cache performed a primary-key lookup without an owner filter. This could disclose private flow structure, configured values, and selected outputs and could trigger victim-configured side effects and build-history records, although it did not expose the victim's variable-store credentials or permit modification of the stored flow. This issue is fixed in Langflow 1.10.1 and langflow-base 0.10.1.

Patch / fix

  • pypi langflow 1.10.1
  • pypi langflow-base 0.10.1
  • langflow langflow 1.10.1
  • langflow langflow-base 0.10.1

Is CVE-2026-105698 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
Proof of concept is public
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
last mo.

Exploit prediction

0.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 13% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).

Exploits and checks

  • github.com https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 5.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
GitHub 3.1 5.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
OSV 3.1 5.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi langflow
>=1.0.0, <1.10.1
1.10.1
pypi langflow-base
<0.10.1
0.10.1

Affected products

  • langflow-ai langflow
  • langflow-ai langflow-base

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
  • CWE-862 Missing Authorization

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.