CVE-2026-107496 json
Infinite Loop in CMS_encrypt() With an EC Group Order of 1
published yesterday modified yesterday also EUVD-2026-121711
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.1%
- EPSS 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 2%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Issue summary: Encrypting a CMS message to an EC certificate whose group order is 1 may cause CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() to loop indefinitely.
Impact summary: An attacker able to supply the recipient certificate to an application performing CMS encryption can cause that application to loop indefinitely, consuming CPU and resulting in Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
Description: CMS_encrypt() and CMS_encrypt_ex() encrypt a message to one or more recipient certificates and, for an EC recipient, generate an ephemeral key in the recipient's group. If the certificate declares a group order of 1, random scalar generation can only produce zero. The key generation routine then retries without limit while waiting for a nonzero private scalar, so the call never returns.
The OpenSSL TLS and QUIC implementations do not use this path. An application is exposed only if it calls CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() with a recipient certificate whose EC parameters are attacker-controlled. Certificates with normal EC group orders do not trigger the loop.
OpenSSL 4.0 and later reject unknown explicit EC groups in default builds. These versions are affected only when configured with the enable-ec_explicit_curves option.
The result is a hang that consumes a CPU core until the process is interrupted, a Denial of Service. The severity is Low because the attacker must supply the recipient certificate and the application must choose to encrypt to it; ordinary CMS encryption to trusted recipients is unaffected.
The fix makes EC key generation fail when the group has no valid nonzero private scalar, instead of retrying indefinitely.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.1, 4.0, 3.5 and 3.0 are not affected. The FIPS provider does not support arbitrary explicit EC domain parameters, so an order-1 group is rejected during key import before the vulnerable key generation path is reached.
Patch / fix
- OpenSSL OpenSSL 1.0.2zt, 1.1.1zk, 3.0.24, 3.5.10, 4.0.4, 4.1.1
Is CVE-2026-107496 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerExploit prediction
0.13% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 2% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Affected products
- OpenSSL OpenSSL
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition
- Technology feeds
References
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/36e15b618decdff1b116eead6747718e6e729ad2
patch
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/a8531368ddb1f86d2a2782a8b693926bb67b59e7
patch
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/a0051cfe699bf5a047bc1c4faef65f80f7987366
patch
-
openssl-library.org
/news/secadv/20261110.txt
vendor-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-107496
- NVD CVE-2026-107496
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.