CVE-2026-107938 json
Apache CXF: The Netty HTTP client transport does not perform TLS hostname verification.
published last mo. modified 24d ago also EUVD-2026-95703
- cvss
- 9.1
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 9%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
In Apache CXF, the Netty-based HTTP client transport (cxf-rt-transports-http-netty-client) did not verify that the hostname in the server’s TLS certificate matched the host being called. This applied over both HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2, even when disableCNCheck was left at its default value of false. The certificate chain was validated against the configured trust store, but the endpoint’s identity was not. A network attacker able to intercept traffic could present any certificate trusted by the client, such as a publicly issued certificate for a domain they control, and impersonate the target service. They could then read or modify the exchanged messages, including credentials. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.4 or 4.1.9 or 3.6.13, which fix this issue.
Patch / fix
- Apache Software Foundation Apache CXF 3.6.13, 4.1.9, 4.2.4
Is CVE-2026-107938 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-107938 updated cvss 7.4
org.apache.cxf/cxf-rt-transports-http-netty-client: Apache CXF: Information disclosure via missing TLS hostname verification
-
Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4 cxf-rt-transports-http-netty-client 4.1.8.rhbac-redhat-00002affected: no fix available
-
Red Hat Fuse 7 cxf-rt-transports-http-netty-client 4.1.8.rhbac-redhat-00002not affected: vulnerable code not in execute path
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
- Assessed
- 25d ago
Exploit prediction
0.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 9% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-09).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 9.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 9.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N |
Affected products
- Apache Software Foundation Apache CXF
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-297 Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
References
-
lists.apache.org
/thread.html/ljsjsq1foyjy1v5o22oncw80twx7k2tc
vendor-advisory, issue-tracking
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2026/10/09/13
mailing-list, third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-107938
- NVD CVE-2026-107938
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.