A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 thro…

published 2026-11-11 13h ago modified 2026-11-11 12h ago also EUVD-2026-123825

cvss: 7.2; version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: —; no EPSS score yet
public exploits: 0; none known

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands as root via specially crafted HTTP requests.

Is CVE-2026-126158 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
CNA	3.1	7.2	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C
CNA	3.1	7.2	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected products

Fortinet FortiMail

Classification

Weakness

CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Technology feeds

Fortinet rss critical rss

References

fortiguard.fortinet.com /psirt/FG-IR-26-210

Sources

CVE List CVE-2026-126158
NVD CVE-2026-126158

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.