CVE-2026-126271 json
NocoDB before 2026.09.0 TLS Private Key Exposure via Data Source Read
published 19d ago modified yesterday also EUVD-2026-125250 , GHSA-rjc4-j36j-gjjc
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository nocodb/nocodb. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 7.7
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 14%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
NocoDB before 2026.09.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows authenticated base Viewers to obtain TLS client private keys by reading a base's data source. The source read handler masked only the connection password, letting attackers retrieve the decrypted private key, client certificate and CA to connect directly to the external database, bypassing NocoDB permissions.
Patch / fix
- nocodb nocodb 2026.09.0
Is CVE-2026-126271 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- yesterday
Exploit prediction
0.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 14% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N |
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
Inferred packages
No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.
| ecosystem | package | repository | affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | nocodb | nocodb/nocodb | < 2026.09.0 |
Affected products
- nocodb nocodb
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials
References
-
github.com
/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-rjc4-j36j-gjjc
vendor-advisory, advisory
-
vulncheck.com
/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.09.0-tls-private-key-exposure-via-data-source-read
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-126271
- NVD CVE-2026-126271
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-rjc4-j36j-gjjc
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of nocodb/nocodb published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.