CVE-2026-126276 json
NocoDB before 2026.08.1 Client Authentication Bypass via OAuth Token Exchange
published 19d ago modified 2d ago also EUVD-2026-125245 , GHSA-4cx5-q9xx-5pgj
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository nocodb/nocodb. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 6.3
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 4%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
NocoDB before 2026.08.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in oauth-token.service.ts that treats PKCE as a substitute for confidential client authentication, skipping client secret verification when omitted. Attackers holding a captured authorization code and PKCE verifier can mint access tokens and 60-day refresh tokens for a confidential client without knowing its secret.
Patch / fix
- nocodb nocodb 2026.08.1
Is CVE-2026-126276 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerExploit prediction
0.15% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 4% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.2 | CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 6.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N |
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.2 | CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
| NVD | 3.1 | 6.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N |
Inferred packages
No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.
| ecosystem | package | repository | affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | nocodb | nocodb/nocodb | < 2026.08.1 |
Affected products
- nocodb nocodb
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-287 Improper Authentication
References
-
github.com
/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-4cx5-q9xx-5pgj
vendor-advisory, advisory
-
vulncheck.com
/advisories/nocodb-before-2026.08.1-client-authentication-bypass-via-oauth-token-exchange
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-126276
- NVD CVE-2026-126276
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-4cx5-q9xx-5pgj
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of nocodb/nocodb published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.