Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.5

CVE-2026-126294 json

Grav Login Plugin before 3.11.0 Two-Factor Authentication Bypass via /login

published 19d ago modified yesterday also EUVD-2026-125227 , GHSA-4x9h-4683-5fcx

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository getgrav/grav. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
7.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.9%
EPSS 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 59%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Grav Login plugin before 3.11.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers with an account password to skip two-factor verification when the global twofa_enabled setting is off. Attackers can sign in through the /login form, remember-me cookie, or magic link to obtain a session the API plugin accepts, gaining full account permissions including super-admin control.

Patch / fix

  • getgrav grav 3.11.0

Is CVE-2026-126294 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
yesterday

Exploit prediction

0.88% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 59% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CNA 4.0 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Affected products

  • getgrav grav

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of getgrav/grav published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.