Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.3

CVE-2026-126396 json

vLLM from 0.24.0 before 0.31.0 Resource Exhaustion via MiniMax M3 min_pixels

published 18d ago modified yesterday also EUVD-2026-125169 , GHSA-w4cg-mhc7-mgw3

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository vllm-project/vllm. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
5.3
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.4%
EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 31%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

vLLM from 0.24.0 before 0.31.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in the MiniMax M3 VL video processor, which accepts request-level min_pixels without range or min_pixels <= max_pixels validation. Its video-wide pixel budget is enforced only when max_long_side_pixel is set, and that value defaults to None. API clients can supply a large min_pixels via mm_processor_kwargs to enlarge every decoded frame, causing excessive CPU and host-memory consumption that may disrupt workers or the service.

Patch / fix

  • vllm-project vllm 0.31.0

Is CVE-2026-126396 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
yesterday

Exploit prediction

0.37% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 31% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 6.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CNA 4.0 6.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Inferred packages

No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.

ecosystem package repository affected
pypi vllm vllm-project/vllm
>= 0.24.0, < 0.31.0

Affected products

  • vllm-project vllm

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of vllm-project/vllm published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.