Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.5

CVE-2026-126397 json

vLLM 0.10.1 before 0.31.0 Cohere2 Vision DoS via max_patches

published 18d ago modified 2d ago also EUVD-2026-125168 , GHSA-9g3c-x747-c6wr

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository vllm-project/vllm. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
7.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.5%
EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 40%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

vLLM from 0.10.1 before 0.31.0 forwards a request-controlled mm_processor_kwargs.max_patches value to the Hugging Face processor for Cohere2 Vision models without a server-side upper bound, causing quadratic CPU work during multimodal preprocessing. Remote clients can send small image chat-completion requests with large, varying max_patches values to bypass the LRU cache, exhaust preprocessing workers, and deny service to other clients.

Patch / fix

  • vllm-project vllm 0.31.0

Is CVE-2026-126397 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Exploit prediction

0.46% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 40% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-14).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CNA 4.0 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Inferred packages

No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.

ecosystem package repository affected
pypi vllm vllm-project/vllm
>= 0.10.1, < 0.31.0

Affected products

  • vllm-project vllm

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of vllm-project/vllm published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.