Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.5

CVE-2026-126799 json

Gotenberg 8.31.0 before 8.38.0 SSRF via IPv6 Zone Identifiers in IsPublicIP

published yesterday modified 13h ago also EUVD-2026-124014 , GHSA-fqg9-x2xw-5crx

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository gotenberg/gotenberg. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
7.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no EPSS score yet
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Gotenberg 8.31.0 before 8.38.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in IsPublicIP() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass private-IP deny-list protections using IPv6 zone identifiers. Attackers can append a zone such as %25eth0 to the unspecified address or blocked IPv6 prefixes in downloadFrom, webhook, or Chromium/LibreOffice URLs to reach internal services and read responses in the returned PDF.

Patch / fix

Is CVE-2026-126799 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 6.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N
CNA 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CNA 4.0 6.9 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Affected products

  • gotenberg gotenberg

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of gotenberg/gotenberg published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.