Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 8.1

CVE-2026-126804 json

WWBN AVideo 12.4 through 29.7.1 Path Traversal File Deletion via deleteImage.json.php

published 20h ago modified 13h ago also EUVD-2026-124019 , GHSA-58h3-9722-fgpm

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository WWBN/AVideo. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
8.1
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no EPSS score yet
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

WWBN AVideo 12.4 through 29.7.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the ADs plugin deleteImage.json.php that allows authenticated users with custom ads to delete arbitrary files. Attackers can set the unvalidated is_regular_user parameter to another user's id or ../ sequences to delete other users' ads or files like videos/configuration.php, taking the site offline and re-exposing the installer.

Patch / fix

Is CVE-2026-126804 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 7.2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CNA 4.0 7.2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD 3.1 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Affected products

  • WWBN AVideo

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of WWBN/AVideo published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.