CVE-2026-52726 json
Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload
published 5mo ago modified 3mo ago also EUVD-2026-36195 , GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544 , PYSEC-2026-2465
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 39%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.23.2 and prior to version 1.2.5, `dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update`, and by extension `porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True)`, materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious `.gitmodules` plus a matching tree gitlink whose `path` is `.git/hooks` (or any other directory inside the parent repository's `.git` directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's `.git/hooks/` directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent `git` or `dulwich` command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution. This is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain. Version 1.2.5 patches the issue.
Patch / fix
- pypi dulwich 1.2.5
- dulwich_project dulwich 1.2.5
- dulwich Debian 14 1.2.5-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-52726
Is CVE-2026-52726 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-52726 updated cvss 5.4
dulwich: Dulwich: Arbitrary code execution via crafted Git submodules
-
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9affected: workaround, no fix planned “Will not fix”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 resource-agents, resource-agents-gcp, resource-agents-paf, resource-agents-aliyun Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) rhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9affected: workaround, no fix available
-
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9, ansible-automation-platform-26/eda-controller-rhel9, ansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9, ansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel9not affected: component not present
-
Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) rhoai/odh-kserve-agent-rhel9, rhoai/odh-kserve-router-rhel9, rhoai/odh-kserve-controller-rhel9, rhoai/odh-kserve-autogluon-server-rhel9not affected: vulnerable code not present
-
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 python-dulwichnot affected: vulnerable code not in execute path
-
Red Hat Satellite 6 python-dulwichnot affected: component not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 5mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.45% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 39% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| OSV | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | dulwich | >=0.23.2, <1.2.5 |
1.2.5 |
Affected products
- jelmer dulwich
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
References
-
github.com
/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
exploit, web, advisory
-
github.com
/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5
web
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52726
advisory
-
github.com
/jelmer/dulwich
package
-
pypi.org
/project/dulwich
package
-
github.com
/advisories/GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-52726
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
- NVD CVE-2026-52726
- OSV PYSEC-2026-2465
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-gfhv-vqv2-4544
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of jelmer/dulwich published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.