Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 7.1

CVE-2026-53515 json

Better Auth: Privilege escalation via SSO provider registration: missing admin role check in @better-auth/sso

published 5mo ago modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-44740 , GHSA-gv74-j8m3-fg5f

cvss
7.1
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.4%
EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 37%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. From 1.2.10 until 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register endpoint lets any organization member attach a new SSO provider to that organization because registerSSOProvider checks only for a membership row and does not require an owner or admin role, allowing attacker-controlled OIDC or SAML providers to drive /sso/callback/{providerId} organization provisioning. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.

Patch / fix

  • npm @better-auth/sso 1.6.11
  • better-auth better-auth/sso 1.6.11
  • better-auth better_auth 1.6.11

Is CVE-2026-53515 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
3mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.43% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 37% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
GitHub 3.1 7.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
npm @better-auth/sso
>=1.2.10, <1.6.11
1.6.11

Affected products

  • better-auth better-auth
  • @better-auth sso

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of better-auth/better-auth published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.