Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.1

CVE-2026-56317 json

Nuxt - Cross-Site Scripting via NoScript Component Slot Content

published 5mo ago modified 3d ago also EUVD-2026-38112 , GHSA-m3q2-p4fw-w38m

cvss
6.1
version 3.1, NVD
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.3%
EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 28%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Nuxt before 4.4.7 (and the 3.x branch before 3.21.7) contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the NoScript component that writes slot content to innerHTML without escaping. Attackers can inject malicious scripts through untrusted data in NoScript slots, such as route.query parameters, which execute in the document context when the noscript tag is implicitly closed by script tags.

Patch / fix

Is CVE-2026-56317 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
4mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.34% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 28% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 2.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 4.0 2.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
NVD 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
npm nuxt
>=4.0.0, <4.4.7
<3.21.7
4.4.7
3.21.7

Affected products

  • Nuxt Nuxt

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of nuxt/nuxt published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.