CVE-2026-58508 json
Two SSRF vulnerabilities in Gitea migration/mirror (DNS rebinding + missing re-validation)
published 3mo ago modified 2mo ago also EUVD-2026-58174 , GHSA-j72v-mjr6-3424
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 9.1
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.5%
- EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 41%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Two SSRF vulnerabilities in Gitea migration/mirror (DNS rebinding + missing re-validation)
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2026-58508 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.48% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 41% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 9.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 9.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N |
Affected products
- Gitea Gitea Open Source Git Server
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
References
-
github.com
/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-j72v-mjr6-3424
vendor-advisory, advisory
-
github.com
/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0
release-notes
-
blog.gitea.com
/gitea-1.27.0-is-released/
release-notes
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-58508
- NVD CVE-2026-58508
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-j72v-mjr6-3424
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of go-gitea/gitea published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.