CVE-2026-59725 json
Socket.IO: Engine.IO Polling Transport Connection Exhaustion
published 4mo ago modified 17d ago also EUVD-2026-42313 , GHSA-r635-g3xr-vw7x
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.6%
- EPSS 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 50%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Socket.IO enables bidirectional and low-latency communication for every platform. From 4.1.0 before 6.6.7, Engine.IO protocol v4 polling transport does not properly close the HTTP response for invalid binary POST requests with Content-Type: application/octet-stream, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust server-side connections and sockets. This issue is fixed in version 6.6.7.
Patch / fix
- npm engine.io 6.6.7
- socket engine.io 6.6.7
- dotnet8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.129-2.hum1
- dotnet-sdk-8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.129-2.hum1
- dotnet-sdk-dbg-8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.129-2.hum1
- dotnet-templates-8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.129-2.hum1
- dotnet-sdk-8.0-source-built-artifacts hummingbird 1 8.0.129-2.hum1
- dotnet8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.128-1.1.hum1
- dotnet-sdk-8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.128-1.1.hum1
- dotnet-hostfxr-8.0 hummingbird 1 8.0.28-1.1.hum1
red hat advisories RHSA-2026:42986RHSA-2026:37577
Is CVE-2026-59725 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-59725 updated cvss 7.5
socket.io: engine.io: Socket.IO: Denial of Service via invalid binary POST requests
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9, rhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9, rhelai3/bootc-gaudi-rhel9, rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9affected: no fix available, no fix planned “Will not fix”
-
Red Hat Hardened Images dotnet8.0 8.0.129-2.hum1, dotnet8.0 8.0.128-1.1.hum1, dotnet-sdk-8.0 8.0.129-2.hum1, dotnet-sdk-8.0 8.0.128-1.1.hum1, dotnet-sdk-dbg-8.0 8.0.129-2.hum1, dotnet-hostfxr-8.0 8.0.28-1.1.hum1, +12 morefixed: vendor fix RHSA-2026:37577
-
Red Hat Hardened Images dotnet-hostfxr-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, dotnet-runtime-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, aspnetcore-runtime-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, dotnet-runtime-dbg-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, dotnet-apphost-pack-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, dotnet-targeting-pack-8.0 8.0.29-2.hum1, +2 morenot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 4mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.64% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 50% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | engine.io | >=4.1.0, <6.6.7 |
6.6.7 |
Affected products
- socketio engine.io
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-404 Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
References
-
github.com
/socketio/socket.io/commit/fc11285e14964c2132d122164bf130c355f60671
web, patch
-
github.com
/socketio/socket.io/security/advisories/GHSA-r635-g3xr-vw7x
web, patch, vendor-advisory, advisory
-
github.com
/socketio/socket.io/releases/tag/engine.io@6.6.7
web, release-notes
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59725
advisory
-
github.com
/socketio/socket.io
package
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-59725
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-r635-g3xr-vw7x
- NVD CVE-2026-59725
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-r635-g3xr-vw7x
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of socketio/socket.io published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.