Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 8.1

CVE-2026-62187 json

OpenClaw < 2026.6.9 Feishu tools Authorization Bypass

published 4mo ago modified 18d ago also EUVD-2026-43565 , GHSA-2q7j-2vhx-56g8

cvss
8.1
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.4%
EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 30%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

OpenClaw Feishu tools (npm package @openclaw/feishu) in versions <= 2026.6.6 could ignore per-account disablement. A lower-trust caller or a configured input path could perform actions that should have required a stronger authorization or policy check, resulting in unauthorized operations. The issue is fixed in version 2026.6.9. Impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach the affected feature.

Patch / fix

  • npm @openclaw/feishu 2026.6.9
  • openclaw feishu 2026.6.9

Is CVE-2026-62187 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total
Assessed
3mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.37% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 30% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 8.6 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
GitHub 3.1 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CNA 4.0 8.6 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
npm @openclaw/feishu
<2026.6.9
2026.6.9

Affected products

  • openclaw feishu

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of openclaw/openclaw published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.