Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.5

CVE-2026-62282 json

OpenCVE: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in notifications

published last mo. modified last mo. also GHSA-ch3g-4xvr-674q , PYSEC-2026-4130 , EUVD-2026-82925

cvss
6.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.5%
EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 39%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

OpenCVE is a vulnerability intelligence platform. Prior to 3.0.0, OpenCVE notification testing for Webhook and Slack integrations does not sufficiently validate user-supplied HTTP or HTTPS destinations. An authenticated user with permission to configure notification channels can trigger requests to hosts reachable from the OpenCVE server, including internal network resources, localhost interfaces, link-local addresses, and cloud metadata services, and retrieve information from reachable HTTP services. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.0.

Patch / fix

  • pypi opencve 3.0.0

Is CVE-2026-62282 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2026-62282 updated cvss 6.5

opencve: OpenCVE: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via unvalidated notification destinations

  • Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat products
    not affected: vulnerable code not present

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
Proof of concept is public
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
last mo.

Exploit prediction

0.45% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 39% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

Exploits and checks

  • github.com https://github.com/opencve/opencve/issues/743 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
OSV 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
GitHub 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi opencve
<3.0.0
3.0.0

Affected products

  • opencve opencve

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.