CVE-2026-62941 json
Incus: Cross-project instance copy bypasses target project restrictions via TOCTOU in config merge
published 3mo ago modified 27d ago also EUVD-2026-63951 , GHSA-mq9x-prm8-3vpw
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository lxc/incus. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 9.9
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 38%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.3.0, when copying an instance across projects, the project restriction check (`AllowInstanceCreation`) runs BEFORE the source instance's configuration is merged into the request. Dangerous configuration keys (including `security.privileged`, `raw.lxc`, `raw.apparmor`) from the source instance are merged AFTER the check passes, bypassing all project restrictions on the target project. Version 7.3.0 patches the issue.
Patch / fix
- linuxcontainers incus 7.3.0
- incus Debian 13 6.0.4-2+deb13u9
- incus Debian 14 7.0.1-2
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-62941
- incus openSUSE Tumbleweed 7.4-1.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:11651-1
Is CVE-2026-62941 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-62941 updated cvss 9.9
incus: Incus: Cross-project instance copy bypasses target project restrictions via TOCTOU in config merge
-
Red Hat All currently supported Red Hat productsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.44% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 38% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/lxc/incus/security/advisories/GHSA-mq9x-prm8-3vpw referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 9.9 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected products
- lxc incus
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
References
-
github.com
/lxc/incus/security/advisories/GHSA-mq9x-prm8-3vpw
exploit, advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-62941
- NVD CVE-2026-62941
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-mq9x-prm8-3vpw
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of lxc/incus published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.