CVE-2026-6507 json
Dnsmasq: dnsmasq: denial of service due to out-of-bounds write in dhcp bootreply processing
published 6mo ago modified 6d ago also EUVD-2026-23419
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.5%
- EPSS 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 42%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
A flaw was found in dnsmasq. A remote attacker could exploit an out-of-bounds write vulnerability by sending a specially crafted BOOTREPLY (Bootstrap Protocol Reply) packet to a dnsmasq server configured with the `--dhcp-split-relay` option. This can lead to memory corruption, causing the dnsmasq daemon to crash and resulting in a denial of service (DoS).
Patch / fix
- thekelleys.org.uk dnsmasq 2.93
- dnsmasq Debian 14 2.92-4
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-6507
- dnsmasq Ubuntu 26.04 LTS 2.92-1ubuntu0.3
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2026-6507
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- dnsmasq Linux Micro 6.1 2.93-slfo.1.1_1.1
- dnsmasq SLES for SAP applications 16.0, SLES 16.0 2.93-160000.1.1
- dnsmasq SLES LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5, SLES 12 SP5-LTSS 2.92rel2-18.27.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2026:22454-1SUSE-SU-2026:22496-1SUSE-SU-2026:2458-1
- dnsmasq openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.93-160000.1.1
- dnsmasq openSUSE Tumbleweed 2.92-3.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:21192-1openSUSE-SU-2026:10605-1
Is CVE-2026-6507 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-6507 updated cvss 7.5
dnsmasq: dnsmasq: Denial of Service due to out-of-bounds write in DHCP BOOTREPLY processing
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 dnsmasq, dnsmasq-utils Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 dnsmasq, dnsmasq-utilsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 dnsmasq, dnsmasq-utilsnot affected: component not present
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 dnsmasq, dnsmasq-utils Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 dnsmasq Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9not affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 6mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.48% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 42% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
Affected products
- thekelleys.org.uk dnsmasq
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write
References
-
access.redhat.com
/security/cve/CVE-2026-6507
vdb-entry
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=2459181
issue-tracking
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-6507
- NVD CVE-2026-6507
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.