Supermicro BMC IPMI feature contains a Privilege escalation vulnerability

published 2026-10-27 15d ago modified 2026-11-04 7d ago also EUVD-2026-110636

cvss: 8.8; version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 0.3%; EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 17%
public exploits: 0; none known

A logic flaw in the BMC IPMI implementation may allow an attacker to send specially crafted RAKP+ messages and escalate an account to administrator privileges.

Is CVE-2026-65220 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: total
Assessed: 7d ago (2026-11-04)

Exploit prediction

0.26% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 17% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
CNA	3.1	8.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected products

SMCI MBD-X12SPI

Classification

Weakness

CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management

References

supermicro.com /en/support/security_BMC_IPMI_Oct_2026_1

Sources

CVE List CVE-2026-65220
NVD CVE-2026-65220

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.