CVE-2026-65370 json
HTTP Request Smuggling due to mishandled Transfer-Encoding parsing
published 2mo ago modified 18d ago also EUVD-2026-57604 , GHSA-56h2-h3h4-m9x6
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository apple/servicetalk. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.3%
- EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 28%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
ServiceTalk HTTP/1.x incorrectly handles malformed Transfer-Encoding which could result in request smuggling attacks. This vulnerability is addressed in servicetalk version 0.42.65.
Patch / fix
- Apple servicetalk 0.42.65
Is CVE-2026-65370 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.34% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 28% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
Affected products
- Apple servicetalk
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests
References
-
github.com
/apple/servicetalk/security/advisories/GHSA-56h2-h3h4-m9x6
third-party-advisory, advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-65370
- NVD CVE-2026-65370
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-56h2-h3h4-m9x6
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of apple/servicetalk published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.