CVE-2026-67547 json
taOS: Authenticated Non-Admin Host Code Execution via Skill Runtime
published 4mo ago modified 12h ago also GHSA-h24f-gp4c-8qjm , EUVD-2026-124049
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository jaylfc/taOS. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 8.8
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no EPSS score yet
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
taOS is a self-hosted AI agent OS. Prior to version 1.0.0-beta.23, the POST /api/skill-exec/{skill_id}/call endpoint in taOS executes built-in skills — including the code_exec skill which runs arbitrary Python via subprocess.run(["python3", "-c", code]) — without performing any admin role check, skill ownership check, or agent assignment verification. Any authenticated non-admin user can supply attacker-controlled Python code in the request body and have it executed as the taOS backend process user on the host, achieving full remote code execution with no privilege escalation required beyond a valid (non-admin) session. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.0-beta.23.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2026-67547 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected products
- jaylfc taOS
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
References
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-67547
- NVD CVE-2026-67547
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-h24f-gp4c-8qjm
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of jaylfc/taOS published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.