CVE-2026-71380 json
httpd applies no timeout while receiving a request body, parking a worker on a stalled client
published 2mo ago modified 14h ago also EUVD-2026-69226 , GHSA-5vp4-58hc-h8cc
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository erlang/otp. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 8.7
- version 4.0, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.7%
- EPSS 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 52%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending valid request headers with a large Content-Length and then stalling before the body is complete.
httpd_request_handler:handle_info/2 cancels the request timeout as soon as a parse step succeeds, which includes the headers, and the clause that handles a decoder asking for more data re-arms the socket with {active, once} without setting any further timer. httpd_request:whole_body/2 returns such a continuation whenever the bytes received are fewer than the announced Content-Length, so a well-formed request that stops mid-body leaves the worker waiting indefinitely. The periodic byte-rate check that would reclaim it is armed only when minimum_bytes_per_second is configured, which it is not by default. Repeating this across connections occupies every worker permitted by max_clients and denies service to legitimate clients at negligible bandwidth cost.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, OTP 28.5.0.6, and OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, 9.6.2.3, and 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.
Patch / fix
- Erlang OTP 9.3.2.7, 9.6.2.3, 9.7.2, 27.3.4.17, 28.5.0.6, 29.0.6
- erlang Debian 13 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u4
- erlang Debian 14 1:29.0.6+dfsg-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-71380
- erlang Ubuntu 22.04 LTS 1:24.2.1+dfsg-1ubuntu0.7
- erlang Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 1:25.3.2.8+dfsg-1ubuntu4.7
- erlang Ubuntu 26.04 LTS 1:27.3.4.6+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1
- erlang Ubuntu Pro 14.04 LTS 1:16.b.3-dfsg-1ubuntu2.2+esm2
- erlang Ubuntu Pro 16.04 LTS 1:18.3-dfsg-1ubuntu3.1+esm3
- erlang Ubuntu Pro 18.04 LTS 1:20.2.2+dfsg-1ubuntu2+esm3
- erlang Ubuntu Pro 20.04 LTS 1:22.2.7+dfsg-1ubuntu0.5+esm2
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2026-71380
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
Is CVE-2026-71380 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.67% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 52% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.7 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.7 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
Affected products
- Erlang OTP
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-772 Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
References
-
github.com
/erlang/otp/commit/81b453aac5a006bb8d26405f2bc3cf24e9d7733c
patch
-
github.com
/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-5vp4-58hc-h8cc
vendor-advisory, related, advisory
-
cna.erlef.org
/cves/CVE-2026-71380.html
related
-
osv.dev
/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-71380
related
- erlang.org /doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-71380
- NVD CVE-2026-71380
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-5vp4-58hc-h8cc
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of erlang/otp published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.