CVE-2026-73530 json
Flyto2 Core < 2.28.0 SSRF Guard Bypass via is_private_ip()
published 2mo ago modified 2mo ago also EUVD-2026-58242 , GHSA-gc4h-hj7x-gp5p
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository flytohub/flyto-core. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 7.7
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 37%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Flyto2 Core before 2.28.0 contains a server-side request forgery guard bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to reach internal services by supplying URLs using the unblocked IPv6 address `::` which the kernel routes to loopback identically to `0.0.0.0`. Attackers can submit requests or trigger 302 redirects to ` to bypass the private IP range and blocked hostname checks in `is_private_ip()`, reaching services bound to IPv6 loopback across the `http.get`, `http.request`, and `http.batch` modules.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2026-73530 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.43% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 37% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/flytohub/flyto-core/security/advisories/GHSA-gc4h-hj7x-gp5p referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 6.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N |
| CNA | 4.0 | 6.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
| NVD | 3.1 | 7.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N |
Inferred packages
No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.
| ecosystem | package | repository | affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | flyto-core | flytohub/flyto-core | no versions given |
Affected products
- flytohub flyto-core
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery
References
-
github.com
/flytohub/flyto-core/security/advisories/GHSA-gc4h-hj7x-gp5p
vendor-advisory, exploit, advisory
-
github.com
/flytohub/flyto-core/releases/tag/v2.28.0
release-notes
-
vulncheck.com
/advisories/flyto2-core-ssrf-guard-bypass-via-is-private-ip
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-73530
- NVD CVE-2026-73530
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-gc4h-hj7x-gp5p
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of flytohub/flyto-core published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.