CVE-2026-77242 json
MCP Atlassian: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-27826: DNS rebinding bypasses SSRF validation (validated IP not pinned)
published 4mo ago modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-84627 , GHSA-72fm-whvq-jghf
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository sooperset/mcp-atlassian. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.3%
- EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 23%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
MCP Atlassian is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Atlassian products (Confluence and Jira). Prior to 0.22.0, validate_url_for_ssrf checks a hostname's resolved addresses, but Requests and urllib3 resolve the hostname again when connecting. A caller can use a short-lived DNS answer that is public during validation and private during connection, preserving unauthenticated access to internal or metadata endpoints despite the earlier CVE-2026-27826 remediation. The advisory traces the vulnerable input and processing flow through validate_url_for_ssrf, _check_dns_resolution, socket.getaddrinfo, and _make_ssrf_safe_hook, which identify the affected entry points, controls, and code paths. This issue is fixed in version 0.22.0.
Patch / fix
- sooperset mcp_atlassian 0.22.0
- mcp-atlassian mcp_atlassian 0.22.0
Is CVE-2026-77242 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- last mo.
Exploit prediction
0.30% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 23% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/security/advisories/GHSA-72fm-whvq-jghf referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N |
Affected products
- sooperset mcp-atlassian
Classification
References
-
github.com
/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/pull/1448
issue-tracking, patch
-
github.com
/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/commit/b041733473f95119dd539542a43c280737a8e460
patch
-
github.com
/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/security/advisories/GHSA-72fm-whvq-jghf
exploit, vendor-advisory, advisory
-
github.com
/sooperset/mcp-atlassian/releases/tag/v0.22.0
release-notes
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-77242
- NVD CVE-2026-77242
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-72fm-whvq-jghf
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of sooperset/mcp-atlassian published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.