Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.5

CVE-2026-77460 json

EspoCRM: Mass email template renderer leaks restricted record fields

published 2mo ago modified 27d ago also EUVD-2026-102110 , GHSA-28w2-h88g-6vgv

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository espocrm/espocrm. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
6.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 14%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

EspoCRM is an open source customer relationship management application. Prior to 10.0.3, a user with email-template edit access and mass-email sending access can reference restricted record fields in a template because the renderer stops filtering those fields when per-user ACL application is disabled. The same behavior affects group email auto-replies when a regular user can edit the selected template, even though an administrator controls the group email. Rendered messages can disclose restricted user fields. This issue is fixed in version 10.0.3.

Patch / fix

  • espocrm espocrm 10.0.3

Is CVE-2026-77460 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
27d ago

Exploit prediction

0.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 14% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected products

  • espocrm espocrm

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of espocrm/espocrm published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.

CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.