Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 4.3

CVE-2026-79348 json

Any authenticated customer can read any reservation via GET /api/reservations/:id

published 2mo ago modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-89425 , GHSA-2w4m-hjg2-2v92

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository mighty840/kitchenasty. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
4.3
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 9%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

KitchenAsty through 0.3.0 contains a broken object level authorization (IDOR) vulnerability in the reservations API. The endpoint GET /api/reservations/:id in packages/server applies the authenticate middleware but performs no ownership or role check, and the getReservation handler in packages/server/src/controllers/reservation.controller.ts returns the record retrieved by the client-supplied identifier without comparing reservation.customerId to the authenticated principal

Patch / fix

Is CVE-2026-79348 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
last mo.

Exploit prediction

0.20% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 9% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:N/C:L/I:N/PR:L/S:U/UI:N
CNA 3.1 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of mighty840/kitchenasty published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.