Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.1

CVE-2026-82911 json

CSRF in Prospero Flow CRM order confirmation allows unauthorized order state changes

published 2mo ago modified 2mo ago also EUVD-2026-71268

cvss
5.1
version 4.0, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 13%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.

Patch / fix

  • Roskus Prospero Flow CRM 5.15.11

Is CVE-2026-82911 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
2mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 13% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 5.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 4.0 5.1 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Affected products

  • Roskus Prospero Flow CRM

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.