CVE-2026-86806 json
opengeos GeoLibre _is_within_roots server-side request forgery
published 2mo ago modified 2mo ago also EUVD-2026-74051
- cvss
- 7.3
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.6%
- EPSS 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 49%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
A weakness has been identified in opengeos GeoLibre up to 2.3.0. Impacted is the function _is_within_roots. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is recommended to address this issue. Patch name: b745f62e29fa37364686525a21eee5e5c0f8a369. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Patch / fix
- opengeos GeoLibre 2.4.0
- github.com/opengeos/GeoLibre@b745f62 commit
- github.com/opengeos/GeoLibre#1571 pull request
- github.com/opengeos/GeoLibre/releases/tag/v2.4.0 release
Is CVE-2026-86806 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.61% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 49% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 6.9 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:O/RC:C |
| CNA | 3.0 | 7.3 | CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:O/RC:C |
| CNA | 2.0 | 7.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:ND/RL:OF/RC:C |
| CNA | 4.0 | 6.9 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
| NVD | 3.1 | 7.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
| CNA | 2.0 | 7.5 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Inferred packages
No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.
| ecosystem | package | repository | affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | geolibre | opengeos/geolibre | no versions given |
Affected products
- opengeos GeoLibre
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery
References
-
github.com
/opengeos/GeoLibre/pull/1571
issue-tracking, patch
-
github.com
/opengeos/GeoLibre/commit/b745f62e29fa37364686525a21eee5e5c0f8a369
patch
-
github.com
/opengeos/GeoLibre/releases/tag/v2.4.0
patch
-
vuldb.com
/vuln/399812
vdb-entry, technical-description
-
vuldb.com
/vuln/399812/cti
signature, permissions-required
-
vuldb.com
/cve/CVE-2026-86806
third-party-advisory
-
vuldb.com
/submit/911055
third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/opengeos/GeoLibre/issues/1573
issue-tracking
-
github.com
/opengeos/GeoLibre/
product
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-86806
- NVD CVE-2026-86806
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.