Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.5

CVE-2026-89112 json

Broken Access Control in CLA-Assistant � CLA Signature PII Disclosure

published 30d ago modified 27d ago also EUVD-2026-98194 , GHSA-8rcv-xqgf-8743

Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory

Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository cla-assistant/cla-assistant. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.

cvss
6.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 11%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

The admin API endpoint used to retrieve CLA signature records does not consistently enforce the required authorization checks when the target organisation is specified using an organisation ID.An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially access CLA signature records containing contributor information belonging to an organisation they are not authorized to administer.

Is CVE-2026-89112 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
29d ago

Exploit prediction

0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 11% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected products

  • SAP_SE CLA-Assistant

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of cla-assistant/cla-assistant published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.