CVE-2026-90776 json
Nodemailer 9.1.0 through 10.0.4 Denial of Service via Quadratic Address Parsing
published 2mo ago modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-77000 , GHSA-prgh-xp8r-p3m5
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.7%
- EPSS 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 53%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Nodemailer versions 9.1.0 through 10.0.4 contain a quadratic time complexity vulnerability in the addressparser component when parsing email addresses with RFC 5322 comments. Attackers can craft malicious email headers with comment-separated atoms to consume excessive CPU and block the Node.js event loop for several seconds, causing denial of service.
Patch / fix
- npm nodemailer 10.0.5
- nodemailer nodemailer 10.0.5
- node-nodemailer Debian 14 10.0.10+~8.0.1-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-90776
Is CVE-2026-90776 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-90776 updated cvss 7.5
nodemailer: Nodemailer: Denial of Service via crafted email headers
-
Red Hat Developer Hub 1 rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 grafana 12.4.3-2.el10not affected: vulnerable code not present
-
Red Hat Hardened Images grafana13.1 13.1.3-0.8.hum1, grafana13.2 13.2.1-0.3.hum1, grafana12.4 12.4.10-0.2.hum1not affected: component not present
-
Red Hat Self-service automation portal 2 ansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9not affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- last mo.
Exploit prediction
0.68% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 53% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-prgh-xp8r-p3m5 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.7 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| CNA | 4.0 | 8.7 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | nodemailer | >=9.1.0, <10.0.5 |
10.0.5 |
Affected products
- nodemailer nodemailer
Classification
References
-
github.com
/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/c07f17518d25aca8ab2ad66968dcbca538c24b89
patch, web
-
github.com
/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-prgh-xp8r-p3m5
vendor-advisory, exploit, web, advisory
-
github.com
/nodemailer/nodemailer/blob/v10.0.4/src/addressparser/index.ts#L251
technical-description
-
github.com
/nodemailer/nodemailer/releases/tag/v10.0.5
release-notes, web
-
github.com
/nodemailer/nodemailer
product, package
-
vulncheck.com
/advisories/nodemailer-9.1.0-through-10.0.4-denial-of-service-via-quadratic-address-parsing
third-party-advisory, web
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90776
advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-90776
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-prgh-xp8r-p3m5
- NVD CVE-2026-90776
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-prgh-xp8r-p3m5
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of nodemailer/nodemailer published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.