CVE-2026-92764 json
OpenCVE 2.4.0 < 3.1.0 Organization API Ignores Token Scope
published last mo. modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-81032 , GHSA-xvpw-4gpp-w7h7
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository opencve/opencve. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 4.3
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 30%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
OpenCVE versions 2.4.0 before 3.1.0 fails to properly scope the organizations API endpoint to the token's organization, instead returning the token creator's memberships. Attackers with organization-scoped tokens can list and retrieve every organization their creator belongs to, bypassing intended token isolation boundaries.
Patch / fix
Is CVE-2026-92764 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- last mo.
Exploit prediction
0.37% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 30% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/opencve/opencve/issues/744 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 5.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 4.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N |
| CNA | 4.0 | 5.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
Inferred packages
No advisory lists a package for this vulnerability yet. The CVE names these as products and links their GitHub repository, and the package registry names the same repository, so they are probably the affected packages. Low confidence: the versions are the CVE’s own for the product, and a stack check reports the package as unchecked when there are none.
| ecosystem | package | repository | affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | opencve | opencve/opencve | no versions given |
Affected products
- opencve opencve
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
References
-
github.com
/opencve/opencve/releases/tag/v3.1.0
release-notes, patch
-
github.com
/opencve/opencve/issues/744
exploit, technical-description, issue-tracking
-
github.com
/opencve/opencve/security/advisories/GHSA-xvpw-4gpp-w7h7
vendor-advisory, advisory
-
vulncheck.com
/advisories/opencve-organization-api-ignores-token-scope
third-party-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-92764
- NVD CVE-2026-92764
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-xvpw-4gpp-w7h7
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of opencve/opencve published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.