Unauthenticated queue manipulation through connector SSRF and response injection in Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller

published 2026-10-12 30d ago modified 2026-10-15 27d ago also EUVD-2026-97365

cvss: 6.5; version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev: Not listed; not in CISA's catalog
epss: 0.2%; EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 15%
public exploits: 0; none known

In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller v5.12.6 and below, improper validation of outbound request destinations and parameters, unsafe JSONP response formatting, and insufficient validation on queue service can be chained by a remote unauthenticated attacker to issue server-side requests to unintended local handlers and perform unauthorized queue operations.

Is CVE-2026-93693 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical impact: partial
Assessed: 30d ago (2026-10-12)

Exploit prediction

0.24% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 15% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by	version	score	vector
CNA	3.1	6.5	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Affected products

Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller

Classification

Weakness

CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality

References

docs.sharefile.com /en-us/sharefile/storage-zones-controller/5-0/security-vulnerability-sep26
vendor-advisory

Sources

CVE List CVE-2026-93693
NVD CVE-2026-93693

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.