CVE-2026-95692 json
Out-of-Bounds Read and Incorrect IV Length Handling in AES-GCM-SIV
published yesterday modified yesterday also EUVD-2026-121464
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 11%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Issue summary: Setting an AES-GCM-SIV IV shorter than the expected nonce length via EVP_CipherInit_ex() may trigger a heap out-of-bounds read. Supplying a longer IV is silently truncated instead of rejected.
Impact summary: An application passing a caller-supplied IV of the wrong length may crash or read beyond its buffer. Because trailing IV bytes are ignored, an attacker who knows one message and tag may forge messages under a different IV.
CWE: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read
Description: AES-GCM-SIV copies the caller-supplied IV or nonce into its internal state using a copy whose length is taken from the expected nonce size rather than from the length the caller actually provided. When the caller passes a shorter IV, the copy reads past the end of the caller's buffer; AddressSanitizer confirms a heap out-of-bounds read reached through EVP_CipherInit_ex() into ossl_aes_gcm_siv_init(). When the caller passes a longer IV, the implementation silently discards the trailing bytes instead of rejecting the length.
The truncation breaks the binding between the IV and the computed authentication tag. An attacker who has observed a message and its tag under one IV can produce a message and tag that verify under a different IV whose first bytes match, since the surplus bytes never influence the computation. The message itself is unchanged, so this is a failure of IV commitment rather than a classic existential forgery.
Only applications that call EVP_CipherInit_ex() (or the equivalent provider cipher initialization) with an IV length other than the standard 12 bytes for AES-GCM-SIV are affected. The severity is limited because the out-of-bounds read is small and attacker-controlled only in length, and the forgery requires an unusual IV length choice by the application.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as AES-GCM-SIV is not an approved algorithm.
Patch / fix
- OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.5.10, 4.0.4, 4.1.1
Is CVE-2026-95692 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerExploit prediction
0.21% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 11% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
Affected products
- OpenSSL OpenSSL
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
- Technology feeds
References
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/70a47ac78b6f3be1b22fb1551bd0bfcff4f29613
patch
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/510872388f5d145cf870868b3d288a23822cb776
patch
-
github.com
/openssl/openssl/commit/257a3427aa0ef8d9dd2ef5b3e2d1c021a221b116
patch
-
openssl-library.org
/news/secadv/20261110.txt
vendor-advisory
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-95692
- NVD CVE-2026-95692
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.