CVE-2026-96281 json
Flatpak: flatpak: unprivileged active user can bypass anti-downgrade checks for system apps/runtimes
published 3mo ago modified 6d ago also EUVD-2026-88027 , GHSA-q4gr-vc25-57m5
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository flatpak/flatpak. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database, so the affected packages and versions are the maintainers' word. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 6.2
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.1%
- EPSS 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 2%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
On a multi-user system, a user with an active local login session could downgrade a system-wide Flatpak app to an older version by removing the app's remote ref via the unprivileged system-helper RemoveLocalRef method, causing the anti-downgrade check to fail to find a reference date. A malicious local user could use this to expose other users of the same system to an app version with unfixed vulnerabilities.
Patch / fix
- flatpak Debian 13 1.16.6-1~deb13u2
- flatpak Debian 14 1.18.1-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-96281
- flatpak SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES 15 SP5-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS +1 more 1.16.6-150500.3.21.1
- flatpak SLES for SAP 15 SP6, SLES 15 SP6-LTSS, SLE Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 1.16.6-150600.3.12.1
- flatpak SLES LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5, SLES 12 SP5-LTSS 1.4.2-3.15.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2026:5127-1SUSE-SU-2026:4944-1SUSE-SU-2026:4610-1
Is CVE-2026-96281 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerVendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-96281 updated cvss 6.2
flatpak: flatpak: Unprivileged active user can bypass anti-downgrade checks for system apps/runtimes
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 flatpak, flatpak-libs, flatpak-builder, flatpak 1.18.0-1.el10 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 flatpak, flatpak-libs, flatpak-selinux, flatpak 1.18.0-1.el10, flatpak-session-helper Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 flatpak, flatpak-libs, flatpak-selinux, flatpak 1.18.0-1.el10, flatpak-session-helper Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 flatpak 1.18.0-1.el10affected: workaround, no fix available “Ensure that Flatpak apps installed system-wide are fully updated before running them.”
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
- Assessed
- last mo.
Exploit prediction
0.12% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 2% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 6.2 | CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected products
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
References
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-96281
- NVD CVE-2026-96281
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-q4gr-vc25-57m5
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of flatpak/flatpak published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.