Skip to content
Fencer Intel
low 3.7

CVE-2026-97764 json

django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacke…

published last mo. modified last mo. also EUVD-2026-86517

cvss
3.7
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 13%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the handling of diacritics (e.g., accents) for a higher effective limit.

Patch / fix

  • allauth django-allauth 65.19.4
  • python-django-allauth openSUSE Tumbleweed 65.19.4-1.1

opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:11903-1

Is CVE-2026-97764 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
last mo.

Exploit prediction

0.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 13% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-11).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 3.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Affected products

  • allauth django-allauth

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-180 Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.