Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.3

GHSA-26jh-r8g2-6fpr json

Gradio's dropdown component pre-process step does not limit the values to those in the dropdown list

published 2y ago modified 2mo ago

cvss
5.3
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

### Impact **What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?**

This vulnerability is a **data validation issue** in the Gradio `Dropdown` component's pre-processing step. Even if the `allow_custom_value` parameter is set to `False`, attackers can bypass this restriction by sending custom requests with arbitrary values, effectively breaking the developer’s intended input constraints. While this alone is not a severe vulnerability, it can lead to more critical security issues, particularly when paired with other vulnerabilities like file downloads from the user's machine.

### Patches Yes, this issue is addressed in `gradio>=5.0`. Please upgrade to the latest version to resolve the problem.

### Workarounds **Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?**

To mitigate the issue without upgrading, developers can add manual validation in their prediction function to check the received values against the allowed dropdown values before processing them.

Patch / fix

  • pypi gradio 5.0.0

Is GHSA-26jh-r8g2-6fpr in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi gradio
<5.0.0
5.0.0

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

The maintainers of gradio-app/gradio published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.