GHSA-2hfc-r8fq-92h7 json
Resource injection in the issue-opened.yml workflow leads to execution of arbitrary JavaScript code within a privileged workflow
published 2y ago modified 2y ago
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository electron/electron. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database and no CVE record has reached us yet, so everything here comes from the maintainers alone. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- 6.4
- version 3.1, the maintainers
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Security advisory published by the maintainers of electron/electron for electron/electron/.github/workflows/issue-opened.yml: the maintainers' own advisory, not a reviewed GitHub Advisory Database entry. The full advisory is on GitHub.
Is GHSA-2hfc-r8fq-92h7 in your stack? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| the maintainers | 3.1 | 6.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-99 Improper Control of Resource Identifiers
References
Sources
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-2hfc-r8fq-92h7
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of electron/electron published their own advisory on GitHub. Its facts and headline are shown here; the description stays on GitHub.