GHSA-cjv3-m589-v3rx json
OpenClaw has Canvas route hardening for mixed-trust deployments
published 8mo ago modified 8mo ago
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
## Summary This advisory tracks a defense-in-depth hardening for canvas routes. In mixed-trust or network-visible deployments, prior canvas auth/fallback behavior could broaden access beyond intended boundaries.
## Deployment Context OpenClaw’s default model is trusted host + loopback-first access. Some operators intentionally expose canvas routes on LAN/tailnet. This update is aimed at those broader deployment patterns.
## What Changed - Require explicit token or session-capability authorization for canvas routes. - Remove shared-IP fallback paths for canvas access. - Tighten bind/fallback behavior to fail closed.
## Impact Risk was highest in non-loopback or mixed-trust environments. In strict single-operator trusted-host setups, practical exposure is lower.
## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Vulnerable: `<= 2026.2.19-2` - Patched: `2026.2.21` (next release target)
## Fix Commit(s) - `c45f3c5b004c8d63dc0e282e2176f8c9355d24f1` - `08a7967936cfc0b2af6b27ec1f9272542648ad6c`
Thanks @NucleiAv for reporting.
Patch / fix
- npm openclaw 2026.2.21
Is GHSA-cjv3-m589-v3rx in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | openclaw | <2026.2.21 |
2026.2.21 |
Classification
References
Sources
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-cjv3-m589-v3rx
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-cjv3-m589-v3rx
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of openclaw/openclaw published their own advisory on GitHub. Reviewed sources take precedence over it.