Skip to content
Fencer Intel
critical 10.0

GHSA-f25v-x6vr-962g json

Pheditor: Authentication Bypass in Forced Password-Change Flow via Unverified Current Password

published 3mo ago modified 3mo ago

cvss
10.0
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

## Summary

The forced password-change flow, triggered when the stored password is still the default (`admin`), does not verify that the password submitted by the client actually matches the current password. Any non-empty value in `pheditor_password` is enough to reach the password-change form, and submitting `pheditor_new_password` / `pheditor_confirm_password` in the same request is enough to set an arbitrary new password and obtain an authenticated session — without ever proving knowledge of the current password.

## Root Cause

`pheditor.php` line 163:

```php if (PASSWORD == hash('sha512', 'admin')) { // still default — force change prompt ```

This checks whether the **stored** `PASSWORD` constant is still the default value. It does not check whether the **submitted** `pheditor_password` matches it. As a result, on any instance that hasn't changed the default password, the check passes regardless of what the client actually sends, and the subsequent password-change branch is reachable without authentication.

## PoC

```bash TARGET="https://victim.com/pheditor.php"

# Any non-empty value works here — password is never actually verified curl -c /tmp/j.txt \ -d 'pheditor_password=anything' \ -d 'pheditor_new_password=attacker123' \ -d 'pheditor_confirm_password=attacker123' \ "$TARGET" -L -s -o /dev/null

# Session is now authenticated as admin, with the password changed to attacker123 ```

## Impact

On any instance where the default password has not yet been changed, an unauthenticated attacker can set an arbitrary new admin password and obtain a fully authenticated session, without knowing the current password. This is a complete authentication bypass, not merely "default credentials in use" — it holds even if the operator believes the instance is protected because the login form is present.

## Remediation

Verify the submitted password against the stored `PASSWORD` constant *before* entering the forced password-change branch, so the flow is reachable only by someone who actually knows the current password:

```php $submitted_hash = hash('sha512', $_POST['pheditor_password']);

if (PASSWORD == hash('sha512', 'admin') && $submitted_hash === PASSWORD) { // proceed to forced password-change flow } else { // treat as a normal login attempt (including rate-limiting) } ```

## Note on scope

The original report submitted alongside this finding also included two additional items:

- **Unrestricted PHP upload** — addressed as intended behavior (Pheditor is a single-admin PHP file editor; PHP file creation/editing is core to its function, and pattern-restricting only the upload path doesn't reduce risk since the same result is reachable via the `save`/`newfile` action). Documented explicitly in the README's new Security Model section. - **Terminal allowlist bypass (`php -r ...`)** — a duplicate of a previously reported and already-patched issue (GHSA-g3hq-hphg-8fhh, fixed in v2.0.7).

This advisory has been scoped to the authentication bypass specifically, since it's a distinct root cause from both of those. Full responses to all three points are in the comments below.

Patch / fix

  • packagist pheditor/pheditor 2.0.8

Is GHSA-f25v-x6vr-962g in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 10.0 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
packagist pheditor/pheditor
<2.0.8
2.0.8

Classification

Weakness

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.