GHSA-gpgx-58w2-xwwf json
Remote code execution in FastMCP client when parsing a server-supplied tool output schema
published 26d ago modified 26d ago
Unreviewed: the maintainers' own advisory
Published by the maintainers on their GitHub repository PrefectHQ/fastmcp. GitHub has not reviewed it into the GitHub Advisory Database and no CVE record has reached us yet, so everything here comes from the maintainers alone. Read the full advisory on GitHub.
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Security advisory published by the maintainers of PrefectHQ/fastmcp for fastmcp: the maintainers' own advisory, not a reviewed GitHub Advisory Database entry. The full advisory is on GitHub.
Patch / fix
- pypi fastmcp 3.4.8, 4.0.11
Is GHSA-gpgx-58w2-xwwf in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | fastmcp | >=2.10.0, <3.4.8 >=4.0.0a1, <4.0.11 |
3.4.8 4.0.11 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-95 Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code
References
Sources
- Maintainer advisory GHSA-gpgx-58w2-xwwf
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
The maintainers of PrefectHQ/fastmcp published their own advisory on GitHub. Its facts and headline are shown here; the description stays on GitHub.