Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 5.2

GHSA-m8j6-rc5x-wv36 json

nono-py's policy JSON accepts unknown security fields

published 4mo ago modified 4mo ago

cvss
5.2
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

### Summary

nono-py policy handling could fail open in two ways. First, resolving a policy-derived `ProxyConfig` did not automatically enforce `CapabilitySet.proxy_only`, allowing sandboxed children to bypass a resolved domain allowlist by using direct network access. Second, policy JSON accepted unknown security-sensitive fields, so misspelled or unsupported restrictions could be silently ignored.

### Impact

A sandboxed child may receive broader network access than the policy author intended. This can allow outbound requests outside the configured proxy allowlist and may expose sensitive data depending on the execution environment and workload.

### Older-kernel note

On Linux kernels without Landlock ABI v4 network rules, patched versions continue to support proxy-only enforcement through the seccomp supervisor fallback introduced in 807fb4b. Users on older kernels should ensure policy-resolved proxy configurations are coupled to `CapabilitySet.proxy_only(proxy);` merely injecting proxy environment variables is not sufficient.

Patch / fix

  • pypi nono-py 0.10.1

Is GHSA-m8j6-rc5x-wv36 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 5.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi nono-py
<0.10.1
0.10.1

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.