GHSA-m9mp-6x32-5rhg json
scio is vunerable to Remote Command Execution through PyTorch
published last yr. modified last yr.
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
### Impact PyTorch reported a [**critical** vulnerability](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/security/advisories/GHSA-53q9-r3pm-6pq6) when using `torch.load`, even with option `weights_only=True`, for `torch <= 2.5.1`.
In `scio <= 1.0.0`, the lower bound for `torch` is `2.3`.
### Patches The lower bound was changed to `torch >= 2.6`, starting from `scio >= 1.0.1` (currently in dev state).
### Workarounds You can manually check that you are using `torch >= 2.6`.
Is GHSA-m9mp-6x32-5rhg in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | scio-pypi | <=1.0.0 |
no fix listed |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
References
Sources
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-m9mp-6x32-5rhg
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.