Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium —

GHSA-pcc4-rvhr-2pr8 json

Graphify Fortran extractor: incomplete cpp #include hardening allows arbitrary host-file read/exfiltration when indexing an untrusted repo

published 23d ago modified 23d ago

cvss
—
not scored
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

## Summary

The Fortran extractor's C-preprocessor step (`graphify/extractors/fortran.py`, `_cpp_preprocess`) applies an incomplete `#include` hardening. The `-nostdinc -I /dev/null` flags it relies on (comment "Security (F-007)") do **not** stop a capital-`F` Fortran source file from including **absolute paths** (`#include "/etc/passwd"`) or from **path-traversing out of the corpus** (`#include "../../../../home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa"`). `cpp` always searches the directory of the file being preprocessed for quoted includes and always honours absolute include paths, regardless of `-nostdinc`/`-I`. As a result, indexing an untrusted repository that contains a `.F`/`.F90`/`.F95`/`.F03`/`.F08` file reads arbitrary local files off the host and inlines their contents into the knowledge graph, which is then shipped to the LLM/agent and written to the on-disk, shareable output (`graph.json`, `GRAPH_REPORT.md`, the Obsidian wiki, HTML/SVG exports).

This is the exact "corpus-side file-exfiltration vector" the F-007 comment says it is defending against; the mitigation is bypassable.

## Severity

High. Arbitrary local-file read on the host, triggered by graphify's core action (indexing an untrusted folder — "turn any folder of code ... into a queryable knowledge graph"), defeating a documented security control. It runs on the default, offline, no-API-key AST path (`graphify update .` / `graphify extract`) — no credentials, network, or LLM call required. CWE-73 (external control of file name/path) / CWE-22 (path traversal) / CWE-200 (information exposure).

## Where

`graphify/extractors/fortran.py`, `_cpp_preprocess()`:

result = subprocess.run( ["cpp", "-w", "-P", "-nostdinc", "-I", "/dev/null", str(path.resolve())], capture_output=True, timeout=30, )

Reached from `extract_fortran()` (same file) for any suffix in `_FORTRAN_CPP_EXTS = {".F", ".F90", ".F95", ".F03", ".F08"}`, which are collected by default (`detect.CODE_EXTENSIONS`) and dispatched by `extract._DISPATCH`.

## Why the mitigation does not work

`-nostdinc` only removes the standard *system* include directories, and `-I /dev/null` only sets the *additional* search path. Neither affects:

1. Absolute includes — `#include "/etc/passwd"` is opened directly by cpp. 2. Quoted includes relative to the current file — cpp always searches the directory containing the file being preprocessed for `#include "..."`, so `#include "../../../../etc/shadow"` traverses out of the corpus.

## Proof of concept (verified)

Reproduced against the shipped code with the exact command `_cpp_preprocess` builds (`cpp -w -P -nostdinc -I /dev/null <file>`), and against `extract_fortran()` directly.

Secret on disk (`/tmp/secret.txt`): `TOP_SECRET_...`

(a) Absolute include — `evil_abs.F90`:

program evil #include "/absolute/path/to/secret.txt" end program evil

(b) Relative traversal — `evil_rel.F90`:

program evil #include "../secret.txt" end program evil

Both produce preprocessed output containing the full secret file contents (`"SECRET IN OUTPUT: True"` for both).

Surfacing into the graph — `leak.F90` places the include in an identifier position via a free-form continuation so the leaked value becomes a node/edge:

module m contains subroutine s use & #include "/path/to/token.secret" end subroutine s end module m

`extract_fortran()` on this file emits a node whose label is the entire single-line contents of `token.secret` and an `imports` edge to it. That node is written to `graph.json` / `GRAPH_REPORT.md` / the wiki and returned by the MCP `query_graph` / `get_node` / `get_neighbors` tools — i.e. exfiltrated into the agent's context and into persisted, shareable artifacts.

Fidelity note: Fortran is case-insensitive, so captured identifiers are lower-cased. Case-insensitive secrets (file paths, hostnames, usernames, hex tokens, connection-string fragments, and the mere existence/partial content of a readable file) leak cleanly; high-entropy case-sensitive blobs (base64/JWT) are partially corrupted by the lower-casing but still confirm readability and structure. Single-token-per-line secret files (API-key files, single-line credential/token files) leak that token in full (lower-cased). Requires `cpp`/gcc on PATH (near-ubiquitous on the dev/CI hosts graphify targets); it cleanly falls back to raw bytes when absent.

## Suggested fix

Mirror the containment approach already used elsewhere in the codebase (`_project_xml_is_safe`, `security.validate_graph_path`): before invoking cpp, scan the source for `#include` directives and **refuse or neutralise any include whose target is absolute or resolves outside the corpus/repo root**. Concretely, in `_cpp_preprocess`:

- Parse `#include "..."` / `#include <...>` directives. - Resolve each target against the file's directory; if it is absolute, or its `.resolve()` escapes the scan root, strip that line (or fall back to `path.read_bytes()` with no preprocessing). - Only allow includes that resolve to a path inside the corpus root.

A blunter but safe alternative is to strip all `#include` lines before preprocessing (macros still expand; cross-file includes lose fidelity but no host files can be read). Running cpp inside a filesystem sandbox (bwrap/unshare with only the corpus mounted) would also close it but is heavier.

## Detected by

Aeon vuln-scanner. Semgrep flagged the Fortran subprocess path; manual review of the F-007 mitigation plus an empirical `cpp` repro confirmed the bypass.

Patch / fix

Is GHSA-pcc4-rvhr-2pr8 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi graphifyy
>=0.7.2, <0.9.70
0.9.70

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
  • CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.